I’m somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 due to the fact main-stream news have actually ensured really few individuals know the information for the “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought not to have now been arrested into the British to start with while there is no situation, with no genuine research. Look at this and you also will understand why.
One other thing perhaps not widely recognized will there be isn’t any JURY in a rape test in Sweden which is a SECRET TEST. Most of the proof, most of the witnesses, are heard in secret. No public, no jury, no media. Really the only general public component is the charging and also the verdict. There was a judge and two advisers straight appointed by governmental events. So that you never ever would get to know exactly exactly exactly how clearly the full situation is really a stitch-up. Unless you look at this.
You can find therefore inconsistencies that are many Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. Nevertheless the key question which leaps away at me personally – and which strangely i’ve maybe not seen asked any place else – is this:
Why did Anna Ardin maybe perhaps not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood into the group that is swedish Assange when it comes to shocking red cashmere sweater she had used within the front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange ended up being intending to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a pal who had been interested in Assange:
“He’s maybe not right right right here. He’s planned to own intercourse using the girl that is cashmere night, although not caused it to be. Possibly he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days early in the day, on 13 August, she was indeed intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she had been prepared to take to (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s life that is entire. She had been additionally to convey that this attack included enforced non-safe sex and she had been worried about HIV.
If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced non-safe sex she make no attempt to warn Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in danger of her life on her and this could have transmitted HIV, why did? And just why had been Ardin speaking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about this to buddies, without any obvious disapproval or discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information and even had organised her enrollment for the press meeting. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.
Why don’t we fit that into an extremely brief survey of this entire Ardin/Assange relationship.
11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for the press meeting organised by a branch associated with the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat for him in which to stay as she’s going to be away.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s got supper with Assange and they’ve got consensual sex, from the very first day’s meeting. Ardin later alleges this changed into attack by surreptitious mutilation associated with condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to do something as Julian’s press secretary. She sits close to him in the dais at their press seminar. Assange satisfies Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to visit a party that is crayfish anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This make an effort to look for a crayfish celebration fails, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early early morning. Another offers to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stay with them. She replies: “He can stick to me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless in the crayfish party with Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting in the open air at 02:00 and barely freezing with all the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, based on both their authorities testimonies, rest once more in exactly the same bed that is single and continue doing therefore for the following couple of days. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have intercourse; Anna tells police they just do not. That night, Anna and Julian get together to, and then leave together from, a supper aided by the leadership associated with Pirate Party. They again sleep within the exact same bed.
16 August: Julian would go to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen: www.camsloveaholics.com/rabbitscams-review/ Ardin will not warn her of prospective assault that is sexual. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once again declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say she actually is concerned about STD’s including HIV after unsafe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague for a passing fancy ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist police, Irmeli Krans. Ardin tells Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to simply simply just take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s unrecorded – in breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration accusing Assange of rape. Wilen will not signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities statement alleging Assange has surreptiously had sex that is unprotected her eight times previously.
Some times later on: Ardin creates a broken condom towards the authorities as proof; but a forensic assessment finds no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA about it, as well as it’s evidently unused.
No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s interview that is ardin-arranged Krans – and Wilen arrived forward never to whine of an attack, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration rape that is alleging that has been drafted by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
It is simple this 1 of a few things occurred:
Ardin ended up being intimately assaulted with non-safe sex, but did not alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, come in general general public and personal with him, behave as his press assistant, and rest in identical sleep with him, refusing duplicated provides to allow for him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after providing him the application of her one sleep flat while she ended up being away. By her very own admission, she had consensual intercourse with him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and seems at the least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after unsafe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning friend that is feminist policewoman Irmeli Krans, so that you can twist Wilen’s tale into a sexual assault – really easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape regulations. Wilen declined to sign.
During the police place on 20 August, Wilen texted a buddy at 14.25 “did n’t need to place any fees against JA nevertheless the authorities wished to control him. ”
At 17.26 she texted because I only wanted him to take a test” that she was “shocked when they arrested JA.
The next night at 22.22 she texted “it had been law enforcement whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then constructed her very own tale of intimate assault. As a lot of buddies knew she had been making love with Assange, she could perhaps maybe maybe not claim non-consensual intercourse. Therefore she manufactured her story to fit right in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event of this torn condom. Nevertheless the condom that is torn produced does not have any trace of Assange onto it. It really is impractical to wear a condom rather than keep a DNA trace.
No difficulty is had by me in stating that We securely believe Ardin to be always a liar. On her tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior which will be, within the literal feeling, amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you had been never ever expected to see all of this detail. Rape studies in Sweden take place completely in key. There is absolutely no jury, additionally the government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental events. The trial will be secret, and the next thing you will hear is that he is guilty and a rapist if Assange goes to Sweden, he will disappear into jail.
Next, needless to say, it doesn’t matter the data is indeed poor, as simply to cry rape is always to tarnish a reputation that is man’s. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in destroying most of the ongoing work and life of Assange. The important points of this whole story being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line that it’s incorrect also to check out evidence. That she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro groups in Havana and Miami if you are not allowed to know who the accuser is, how can you find out?
Finally, to those helpful idiots who declare that how you can test these things is with in court, I would personally say needless to say, you might be appropriate, we have to trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, and now we should definitely condemn the disgraceful behavior of the whom campaigned for the Birmingham Six.